Managing virtual computing nodes using isolation and migration techniques

ABSTRACT

Systems and method for the management of virtual machine instances are provided. A network data transmission analysis system can use contextual information in the execution of virtual machine instances to isolate and migrate virtual machine instances onto physical computing devices. The contextual information may include information obtained in observing the execution of virtual machines instances, information obtained from requests submitted by users, such as system administrators. Still further, the network data transmission analysis system can also include information collection and retention for identified virtual machine instances.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/895,265, filed Sep. 30, 2010 the entirety of which is incorporated herein.

BACKGROUND

Generally described, computing devices utilize a communication network, or a series of communication networks, to exchange data. Companies and organizations operate computer networks that interconnect a number of computing devices to support operations or provide services to third parties. The computing systems can be located in a single geographic location or located in multiple, distinct geographic locations (e.g., interconnected via private or public communication networks). Specifically, data centers or data processing centers, herein generally referred to as a “data center,” may include a number of interconnected computing systems to provide computing resources to users of the data center. The data centers may be private data centers operated on behalf of an organization or public data centers operated on behalf, or for the benefit of, the general public.

To facilitate increased utilization of data center resources, virtualization technologies may allow a single physical computing device to host one or more instances of virtual machines that appear and operate as independent computing devices to users of a data center. With virtualization, the single physical computing device can create, maintain, delete, or otherwise manage virtual machines in a dynamic matter. In turn, users can request computer resources from a data center, including single computing devices or a configuration of networked computing devices, and be provided with varying numbers of virtual machine resources.

Generally, the physical networks include a number of hardware devices that receive packets from a source network component and forward the packet to a recipient network component. The packet routing hardware devices are typically referred to as routers. With the advent of virtualization technologies, networks and routing for those networks can now be simulated using commodity hardware rather than actual routers. As the scale and scope of data centers has increased, provisioning and managing the physical and virtual computing resources of a data center has become increasingly complicated. Specifically, in one aspect, a third party data center provider may host a number of virtual machine instances on a single physical computing device in which at least some of the virtual machine instances are associated with different third party users, or customers. As such, it may be possible that some virtual machine instances may expose other, non-associated virtual machine instances to disruptive, prohibited, or otherwise non-approved actions/behavior. Accordingly, the data center provider/operator may wish to isolate some virtual machines instances and perhaps limit the exposure of non-associated virtual machine instances to the non-approved actions/behavior.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this disclosure will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a substrate network having computing nodes associated with a virtual computer network;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the substrate network of FIG. 1 illustrating logical networking functionality;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the substrate network of FIG. 1 illustrating a substrate network configuration associated with overlay networks;

FIGS. 4A and 4B are block diagrams of the substrate network of FIG. 1 illustrating independently determined substrate routing;

FIGS. 5A and 5B are block diagrams of the substrate network of FIG. 1 illustrating virtual route selection propagation to the substrate network;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the substrate network of FIG. 1 illustrating the determination of routes into or out of a virtual network by network translation device;

FIG. 7A illustrates a flow diagram for a process of propagating virtual routes to a substrate network;

FIG. 7B illustrates a flow-diagram for a process of determining substrate routing based on target performance characteristics of the associated virtual network;

FIG. 8 is a simplified block diagram of the substrate network of FIG. 1;

FIG. 9 is a simplified block diagram of the substrate network of FIG. 1;

FIGS. 10A and 10B are block diagrams of the simplified substrate network of FIG. 1 illustrating the monitoring and migration of virtual machine instances;

FIGS. 11A and 11B are block diagrams of the simplified substrate network of FIG. 1 illustrating the monitoring of virtual machine instances; and

FIG. 12 is a flow diagram illustrative of a virtual machine process management routine.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Generally described, aspects of the present disclosure relate to the management of virtual machine instances. Specifically, embodiments of network data transmission analysis systems and methods are disclosed that can use contextual information in the execution of virtual machine instances to isolate and migrate virtual machine instances onto physical computing devices. In one aspect, virtual machine instances associated with a set of virtual machine instances to be isolated can be migrated to one or more computing devices designated to host the isolated set of virtual machine instances. In another aspect, virtual machine instances not associated with the set of virtual machine s instances to be isolated can be migrated from the one or more computing devices designated to host isolated the set of virtual machine instances. The contextual information may include information obtained in observing the execution of virtual machines instances, information obtained from requests submitted by users, such as system administrators. Illustrative embodiments of the systems and methods may be implemented on a virtual network overlaid on one or more intermediate physical networks that are used as a substrate network. Still further, embodiments of the network data transmission analysis systems and methods can also include various security and filtering procedures, testing procedures, information collection and retention procedures for identified set of virtual machine instances to be isolated.

The following section discusses various embodiments of managed networks for network data transmission analysis. Following that is further discussion of network data transmission analysis systems and methods that can implement management methodologies established by a network user.

Managed Computer Networks for Network Data Transmission Analysis

With the advent of virtualization technologies, networks and routing for those networks can now be simulated using commodity hardware components. For example, virtualization technologies can be adapted to allow a single physical computing machine to be shared among multiple virtual networks by hosting one or more virtual machines on the single physical computing machine. Each such virtual machine can be a software simulation acting as a distinct logical computing system that provides users with the illusion that they are the sole operators and administrators of a given hardware computing resource. In addition, as routing can be accomplished through software, additional routing flexibility can be provided to the virtual network in comparison with traditional routing. As a result, in some implementations, supplemental information other than packet information can be used to determine network routing.

Aspects of the present disclosure will be described with regard to illustrative logical networking functionality for managed computer networks, such as for virtual computer networks that are provided on behalf of users or other entities. In at least some embodiments, the techniques enable a user to configure or specify a network topology, routing costs, routing paths, and/or other information for a virtual or overlay computer network including logical networking devices that are each associated with a specified group of multiple physical computing nodes. For example, a user (e.g., a network administrator for an organization) or service provider may configure a virtual or overlay network based on detected events, processing criteria, or upon request. With the network configuration specified for a virtual computer network, the functionally and operation of the virtual network can be simulated on physical computing nodes operating virtualization technologies. In some embodiments, multiple users or entities (e.g. businesses or other organizations) can access the system as tenants of the system, each having their own virtual network in the system. In one embodiment, a user's access and/or network traffic is transparent to other users. For example, even though physical components of a network may be shared, a user of a virtual network may not see another user's network traffic on another virtual network if monitoring traffic on the virtual network.

By way of overview, FIGS. 1 and 2 discuss embodiments where communications between multiple computing nodes of the virtual computer network emulate functionality that would be provided by logical networking devices if they were physically present. In some embodiments, some or all of the emulation are performed by an overlay network manager system. FIGS. 2-4B and 7B discuss embodiments where substrate routing decisions can be made independently of any simulated routing in the overlay network, allowing, for example, optimization of traffic on the substrate network based on information unavailable to a virtual network user. FIGS. 5A-7A discuss embodiments where routing decisions implemented on the virtual or overlay network are propagated to the substrate network. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate, however, that the disclosed virtual computer network is illustrative in nature and should not be construed as limiting.

Overlay Network Manager

FIG. 1 is a network diagram illustrating an embodiment of an overlay network manager system (ONM) for managing computing nodes associated with a virtual computer network. Virtual network communications can be overlaid on one or more intermediate physical networks in a manner transparent to the computing nodes. In this example, the ONM system includes a system manager module 110 and multiple communication manager modules 109 a, 109 b, 109 c, 109 d, 150 to facilitate the configuring and managing communications on the virtual computer network.

The illustrated example includes an example data center 100 with multiple physical computing systems operated on behalf of the ONM system. The example data center 100 is connected to a global internet 135 external to the data center 100. The global internet can provide access to one or more computing systems 145 a via private network 140, to one or more other globally accessible data centers 160 that each have multiple computing systems, and to one or more other computing systems 145 b. The global internet 135 can be a publicly accessible network of networks, such as the Internet, and the private network 140 can be an organization's network that is wholly or partially inaccessible from computing systems external to the private network 140. Computing systems 145 b can be home computing systems or mobile computing devices that each connects directly to the global internet 135 (e.g., via a telephone line, cable modem, a Digital Subscriber Line (“DSL”), cellular network or other wireless connection, etc.).

The example data center 100 includes a number of physical computing systems 105 a-105 d and a Communication Manager module 150 that executes on one or more other computing systems. The example data center further includes a System Manager module 110 that executes on one or more computing systems. In this example, each physical computing system 105 a-105 d hosts multiple virtual machine computing nodes and includes an associated virtual machine (“VM”) communication manager module (e.g., as part of a virtual machine hypervisor monitor for the physical computing system). Such VM communications manager modules and VM computing nodes include VM Communication Manager module 109 a and virtual machines 107 a on host computing system 105 a, and VM Communication Manager module 109 d and virtual machines 107 d on host computing system 105 d.

This illustrative data center 100 further includes multiple physical networking devices, such as switches 115 a-115 b, edge router devices 125 a-125 c, and core router devices 130 a-130 c. Switch 115 a is part of a physical sub-network that includes physical computing systems 105 a-105 c, and is connected to edge router 125 a. Switch 115 b is part of a distinct physical sub-network that includes the System Manager module 110, and is connected to edge router 125 b. The physical sub-networks established by switches 115 a-115 b, in turn, are connected to each other and other networks (e.g., the global internet 135) via an intermediate communication network 120, which includes the edge routers 125 a-125 c and the core routers 130 a-130 c. The edge routers 125 a-125 c provide gateways between two or more sub-networks or networks. For example, edge router 125 a provides a gateway between the physical sub-network established by switch 115 a and the interconnection network 120, while edge router 125 c provides a gateway between the interconnection network 120 and global internet 135. The core routers 130 a-130 c manage communications within the interconnection network 120, such as by routing or otherwise forwarding packets or other data transmissions as appropriate based on characteristics of such data transmissions (e.g., header information including source and/or destination addresses, protocol identifiers, etc.) and/or the characteristics of the interconnection network 120 itself (e.g., routes based on the physical network topology, etc.).

The System Manager module 110 and Communication Manager module 109 can configure, authorize, and otherwise manage communications between associated computing nodes, including providing logical networking functionality for one or more virtual computer networks that are provided using the computing nodes. For example, Communication Manager module 109 a and 109 c manages associated virtual machine computing nodes 107 a and 107 c and each of the other Communication Manager modules can similarly manage communications for a group of one or more other associated computing nodes. The Communication Manager modules can configure communications between computing nodes so as to overlay a virtual network over one or more intermediate physical networks that are used as a substrate network, such as over the interconnection network 120.

Furthermore, a particular virtual network can optionally be extended beyond the data center 100, such as to one or more other data centers 160 which can be at geographical locations distinct from the first data center 100. Such data centers or other geographical locations of computing nodes can be inter-connected in various manners, including via one or more public networks, via a private connection such as a direct or VPN connection, or the like. In addition, such data centers can each include one or more other Communication Manager modules that manage communications for computing systems at that data. In some embodiments, a central Communication Manager module can coordinate and manage communications among multiple data centers.

Thus, as one illustrative example, one of the virtual machine computing nodes 107 a 1 on computing system 105 a can be part of the same virtual local computer network as one of the virtual machine computing nodes 107 d 1 on computing system 105 d. The virtual machine 107 a 1 can then direct an outgoing communication to the destination virtual machine computing node 107 d 1, such as by specifying a virtual network address for that destination virtual machine computing node. The Communication Manager module 109 a receives the outgoing communication, and in at least some embodiments determines whether to authorize the sending of the outgoing communication. By filtering unauthorized communications to computing nodes, network isolation and security of entities' virtual computer networks can be enhanced.

The Communication Manager module 109 a can determine the actual physical network location corresponding to the destination virtual network address for the communication. For example, the Communication Manager module 109 a can determine the actual destination network address by dynamically interacting with the System Manager module 110, or can have previously determined and stored that information. The Communication Manager module 109 a then re-headers or otherwise modifies the outgoing communication so that it is directed to Communication Manager module 109 d using an actual substrate network address.

When Communication Manager module 109 d receives the communication via the interconnection network 120, it obtains the virtual destination network address for the communication (e.g., by extracting the virtual destination network address from the communication), and determines to which virtual machine computing nodes 107 d the communication is directed. The Communication Manager module 109 d then re-headers or otherwise modifies the incoming communication so that it is directed to the destination virtual machine computing node 107 d 1 using an appropriate virtual network address for the virtual computer network, such as by using the sending virtual machine computing node 107 a 1's virtual network address as the source network address and by using the destination virtual machine computing node 107 d 1's virtual network address as the destination network address. The Communication Manager module 109 d then forwards the modified communication to the destination virtual machine computing node 107 d 1. In at least some embodiments, before forwarding the incoming communication to the destination virtual machine, the Communication Manager module 109 d can also perform additional steps related to security.

Further, the Communication Manager modules 109 a and/or 109 c on the host computing systems 105 a and 105 c can perform additional actions that correspond to one or more logical specified router devices lying between computing nodes 107 a 1 and 107 c 1 in the virtual network topology. For example, the source computing node 107 a 1 can direct a packet to a logical router local to computing node 107 a 1 (e.g., by including a virtual hardware address for the logical router in the packet header), with that first logical router being expected to forward the packet to the destination node 107 c 1 via the specified logical network topology. The source Communication Manager module 109 a receives or intercepts the packet for the logical first router device and can emulate functionality of some or all of the logical router devices in the network topology, such as by modifying a TTL (“time to live”) hop value for the communication, modifying a virtual destination hardware address, and/or otherwise modify the communication header. Alternatively, some or all the emulation functionality can be performed by the destination Communication Manager module 109 c after it receives the packet.

By providing logical networking functionality, the ONM system provides various benefits. For example, because the various Communication Manager modules manage the overlay virtual network and can emulate the functionality of logical networking devices, in certain embodiments specified networking devices do not need to be physically implemented to provide virtual computer networks, allowing greater flexibility in the design of virtual user networks. Additionally, corresponding modifications to the interconnection network 120 or switches 115 a-115 b are generally not needed to support particular configured network topologies. Nonetheless, a particular network topology for the virtual computer network can be transparently provided to the computing nodes and software programs of a virtual computer network.

Logical/Virtual Networking

FIG. 2 illustrates a more detailed implementation of the ONM system of FIG. 1 supporting logical networking functionality. The ONM system includes more detailed embodiments of the ONM System Manager and ONM Communication Manager of FIG. 1. In FIG. 2, computing node A is sending a communication to computing node H, and the actions of the physically implemented modules 210 and 260 and devices of network 250 in actually sending the communication are shown, as well as emulated actions of the logical router devices 270 a and 270 b in logically sending the communication.

In this example, computing nodes A 205 a and H 255 b are part of a single virtual computer network for entity Z. However, computing nodes can be configured to be part of two distinct sub-networks of the virtual computer network and the logical router devices 270 a and 270 b separate the computing nodes A and H in the virtual network topology. For example, logical router device J 270 a can be a local router device to computing node A and logical router device L 270 b can be a local router device to computing node H.

In FIG. 2, computing nodes A 205 a and H 255 b includes hardware addresses associated with those computing nodes for the virtual computer network, such as virtual hardware addresses that are assigned to the computing nodes by the System Manager module 290 and/or the Communication Manager modules R 210 and S 260. In this example, computing node A has been assigned hardware address “00-05-02-0B-27-44,” and computing node H has been assigned hardware address “00-00-7D-A2-34-11.” In addition, the logical router devices J and L have also each been assigned hardware addresses, which in this example are “00-01-42-09-88-73” and “00-01-42-CD-11-01,” respectively, as well as virtual network addresses, which in this example are “10.0.0.1” and “10.1.5.1,” respectively. The System Manager module 290 maintains provisioning information 292 that identifies where each computing node is actually located and to which entity and/or virtual computer network the computing node belongs.

this example, computing node A 205 a first sends an address resolution protocol (ARP) message request 222-a for virtual hardware address information, where the message is expected to first pass through a logical device J before being forwarded to computing node H. Accordingly, the ARP message request 222-a includes the virtual network address for logical router J (e.g., “10.0.0.1”) and requests the corresponding hardware address for logical router J.

Communication Manager module R intercepts the ARP request 222-a, and obtains a hardware address to provide to computing node A as part of spoofed ARP response message 222-b. The Communication Manager module R can determine the hardware address by, for example, looking up various hardware address information in stored mapping information 212, which can cache information about previously received communications. Communication Manager module R can communicate 227 with the System Manager module 290 to translate the virtual network address for logical router J.

The System Manager module 290 can maintain information 294 related to the topology and/or components of virtual computer networks and provide that information to Communication Manager modules. The Communication Manager module R can then store the received information as part of mapping information 212 for future use. Communication Manager module R then provides computing node A with the hardware address corresponding to logical router J as part of response message 222-b. While request 222-a and response message 222-b actually physically pass between computing node A and Communication Manager module R, from the standpoint of computing node A, its interactions occur with local router device J.

After receiving the response message 222-b, computing node A 205 a creates and initiates the sending of a communication 222-c to computing node H 255 b. From the standpoint of computing node A, the sent communication will be handled as if logical router J 270 a were physically implemented. For example, logical router J could modify the header of the communication 265 a and forward the modified communication 265 b to logical router L 270 a, which would similarly modify the header of the communication 265 b and forward the modified communication 265 c to computing node H. However, communication 222-c is actually intercepted and handled by Communication Manager module R, which modifies the communication as appropriate, and forwards the modified communication over the interconnection network 250 to computing node H by communication 232-3. Communication Manager module R and/or Communication Manager module S may take further actions in this example to modify the communication from computing node A to computing node H or vice versa to provide logical networking functionality. For example, Communication Manager module S can provides computing node H with the hardware address corresponding to logical router L as part of response message 247-e by looking up the hardware address in stored mapping information 262. In one embodiment, a communication manager or computing node encapsulates a packet with another header or label where the additional header specifies the route of the packet. Recipients of the packet can then read the additional header and direct the packet accordingly. A communication manager at the end of the route can remove the additional header.

A user or operator can specify various configuration information for a virtual computer network, such as various network topology information and routing costs associated with the virtual 270 a, 270 b and/or substrate network 250. In turn, the ONM System Manager 290 can select various computing nodes for the virtual computer network. In some embodiments, the selection of a computing node can be based at least in part on a geographical and/or network location of the computing node, such as an absolute location or a relative location to a resource (e.g., other computing nodes of the same virtual network, storage resources to be used by the computing node, etc.). In addition, factors used when selecting a computing node can include: constraints related to capabilities of a computing node, such as resource-related criteria (e.g., an amount of memory, an amount of processor usage, an amount of network bandwidth, and/or an amount of disk space), and/or specialized capabilities available only on a subset of available computing nodes; constraints related to costs, such as based on fees or operating costs associated with use of particular computing nodes; or the like.

Route Selection on Substrate Network

FIG. 3 illustrates an example embodiment of a substrate network 300 having a route manager 336 capable of determining routes for overlay networks. The substrate network 300 can be composed of one or more substrate components or nodes, such as computing nodes, routing nodes, communication links or the like. In FIG. 3, the substrate network 300 includes computing nodes A 302, B 304, C 306, and D 308, which are capable of simulating various components of one or more associated overlay networks. The nodes can be located on the same data center or in multiple data centers. Computing node A is interconnected to node B via network W 310, node B is connected to node C by network X 312, node C is connected to node D by network Y 314, and node D is connected to node A by network Z 316. Networks W, X, Y, and Z can include one or more physical networking devices, such as routers, switches, or the like, and can include private or public connections. Components shown in FIG. 3, such as the computing nodes and communication manager modules, can implement certain of the features of embodiments described above with respect to FIGS. 1 and 2.

In FIG. 3, nodes A 302, B 304, C 306, and D 308 are associated with a respective Communication Manager module 320, 322, 324, and 326. The communication manager modules can implement certain of the features described in the Communication Manager 150, 210, 260 and VM Communication manager 109 a, 109 b, 109 c, 109 d of FIGS. 1 and 2. For example, the Communication Manager module 320 for node A can operate on a hypervisor monitor of the computing node and can direct the communication of one or more virtual computing nodes 330, 332, 334 of node A. The computing nodes, communication managers and Route Manager 336 can be part of the same ONM system. In one embodiment, the computing nodes run the XEN operating system (OS) or similar virtualization OS, with the communication managers operating on domain 0 or the first OS instance and the virtual computing nodes being domain U or additional OS instances.

The communication manager modules in FIG. 3 are in communication with a Route Manager module 336, operating on one or more computing devices, that directs routing for the substrate network 300. In one embodiment, the Route Manager operates as part of the ONM System Manager module 110, 290 of FIGS. 1 and 2, with functionally combined into a single module. The Route Manager can be located within a data center or at a regional level and direct traffic between data centers. In one embodiment, multiple Route Managers can operate in a distributed manner to coordinate routing across multiple data centers.

In FIG. 3, two virtual networks are associated with the substrate network 300. Virtual network 1 (VN1) has components 338, 340, 342, associated with virtual computing nodes on computing nodes A 302, B 304, and C 306. Virtual network 2 (VN2) has components 344, 346, 348 associated with virtual computing nodes on nodes A, C, and D 308.

As the Routing Manager module 336 directs network traffic on the substrate network 300, traffic can be directed flexibly and various network configurations and network costs can be considered. For example, routing paths can be determined based on specified performance levels for the virtual networks. In one embodiment, if the user for VN1 is entitled to a higher service level, such as for faster speed (e.g. lower latency and/or higher bandwidth), traffic associated with VN1 can be routed on a “fast” path of the substrate network 300. For example, in one embodiment, traffic for “platinum” users is prioritized over traffic for “gold” and “silver” users, with traffic from “gold” users prioritized over “silver” users. In one embodiment, at least some packets of the user with the higher service level are prioritized over packets of a user with a lower service level, for example, during times of network congestion. The user may be entitled to a higher level because the user has purchased the higher service level or earned the higher service level through good behavior, such as by paying bills, complying with the operator's policies and rules, not overusing the network, combinations of the same, or the like.

The Route Manager 336 can store user information or communicate with a data store containing user information in order to determine the target performance level for a virtual network. The data store can be implemented using databases, flat files, or any other type of computer storage architecture and can include user network configuration, payment data, user history, service levels, and/or the like. Typically, the Route Manager will have access to node and/or link characteristics for the substrate nodes and substrate links collected using various network monitoring technologies or routing protocols. The Route Manager can then select routes that correspond to a selected performance level for the virtual network and send these routes to the computing nodes. For example, network W 310 and Y 312 can be built on fiber optic lines while network Y 314 and Z 316 are built on regular copper wire. The Route Manager can receive network metrics data and determine that the optical lines are faster than the copper wires (or an administrator can designate the optical lines as a faster path). Thus, the Route Manager, in generating a route between node A 302 and node C 306 for “fast” VN1 traffic, would select a path going through network W and Y (e.g., path A-B-C).

In another situation, where the user for VN2 is not entitled to a higher service level, VN2 traffic from node A 302 to node B 306 can be assigned to a “slow” or default path through network Y 314 and Z 316 (e.g. path A-D-C). In order to track routing assignments, the Routing Manager can maintain the routes and/or route association in a data store, such as a Routing Information Base (RIB) or routing table 350. The Route Manager can also track the target performance criteria 351 associated with a particular virtual network.

In order to direct network traffic on the substrate network 300, the Routing Manager 336 can create forwarding entries for one or more of the Communication Manager modules 320, 322, 324, 326 that direct how network traffic is routed by the Communication Manager. The Communication Manager modules can store those entries in forwarding tables 352, 354, 356, or other similar data structure, associated with a Communication Manager. For example, for VN1, the Route Manager can generate a control signal or message, such as a forwarding entry 358, that directs VN1 traffic received or generated on node A 302 through network W 310 (on path A-B-C). Meanwhile, for VN2, the Route Manager can generate a control signal or message, such as a forwarding entry 360, which directs traffic received on node A through network Z. The Route Manager can send these forwarding entries to the node A Communication Manager 320, which can store them on its forwarding table 352. Thus, network traffic associated with VN1 and VN2, destined for node C 306 received or generated on node A can travel by either path A-B-C or path A-D-C based on the designated performance level for VN1 and VN2.

While the example of FIG. 3 depicts only two virtual networks, the Route Manager 336 can similarly generate and maintain routes for any number of virtual networks. Likewise, the substrate network 300 can include any number of computing nodes and/or physical network devices. Routes can be determined based on multiple performance criteria, such as network bandwidth, network security, network latency, and network reliability. For example, traffic for a virtual network suspected of being used for spamming (e.g. mass advertisement emailing) can be routed through network filters and scanners in order to reduce spam.

FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate a virtual network 401 and corresponding substrate network 402 where substrate routing is independently determined from virtual routing. FIG. 4A illustrates a virtual network including several virtual network components. Virtual computing nodes I4 404 and I5 406 are connected to a logical router 408. The logical router can implement certain of the features described in the logical router 270 a, 270 b of FIG. 2. The logical router is connected to firewalls I1 410 and I2 412. The logical router is configured to direct traffic from I5 to I2 and I4 to I2, as would be the case if I2 were a backup firewall. The forwarding table associated with logical router 409 reflects this traffic configuration. I1 and I2 are connected to a second router 414. The second router is connected to another virtual computing node, I3 415. Thus, based on the topology and associated forwarding table of the virtual network 401, traffic from I4 and I5 to I3 passed through I2.

FIG. 4B illustrates an example topology of the substrate network 402 associated with the virtual network 401. The substrate network includes computing node A 420, computing node B, and a Route Manager 424. Substrate nodes A and B are each associated with a Communication Manager 426, 428. Node A is simulating the operation of virtual components I2, I3, and I5 while Node B is simulating the operation of virtual components on I1 and I4 on their respective virtual machines. The Route Manager can then use information regarding the assignments of virtual components to computing nodes to optimize or otherwise adjust routing tables for the substrate network. The Route Manager can receive such information from the Communication Managers and/or the System Manager. For example, assuming I1 and I2 are identical virtual firewalls, the Route Manager can determine that because I5 and I2 are located on the same computing node, while I4 and I1 are located on the other node, virtual network traffic can be routed from I5 to I2 and from I4 to I1 without leaving the respective computing node, thus reducing traffic on the network. Such a configuration is reflected in the illustrated forwarding tables 430, 432 associated with the Communication Managers. Thus, routes on the substrate network can be determined independently of virtual network routes.

In some embodiments, the Route Manager 424 or System Manager can optimize or otherwise improve network traffic using other techniques. For example, with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B, another instance of I3 can be operated on node B 422, in addition to the instance of I3 on node A. Thus, virtual network traffic from I5-I2-I3 and I4-I1-I3 can remain on the same computing node without having to send traffic between computing nodes A and B. In one embodiment, substrate traffic can be optimized or otherwise improved without having different forwarding entries on the substrate and the virtual network. For example, with reference to FIG. 4B, I4 can be moved from computing node B 422 to node A 420, thus allowing virtual traffic from I5 and I4 to I2 to remain on the same computing node. In this way, a user monitoring traffic on logical router 408 would see that traffic is flowing according the forwarding table in the router, that is, substrate routing is transparent to the user. Other techniques for optimizing traffic by changing the association of virtual components with virtual machines and/or duplicating components can also be used.

In some situations, it can be desired that substrate routes reflect routes specified in the virtual table. For example, the virtual network user can wish to control how traffic is routed in the substrate network. However, rather than giving the user access to the substrate network, which could put other users at risk or otherwise compromise security, a data center operator can propagate network configuration or virtual network characteristics specified by the user for the virtual network to the substrate network. This propagated data can be used in generating routing paths in the substrate network, thus allowing the user to affect substrate routing without exposing the substrate layer to the user.

Route Selection on Overlay/Virtual Network

FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate a virtual route selection propagated to the substrate network. FIG. 5A illustrates a virtual network topology where logical network 1 (LN1) 502 is connected to logical network 2 (LN2) 504 and logical network 3 (LN3) 506 by a logical router 508. The current preferred routing path specified by the user is from LN1 to LN2.

A user may wish to specify a route for various reasons. For example, routing costs through LN2 can be cheaper than LN3, such as when LN2 and LN3 are in different locations with different ISPs and one ISP charges lower rates than another. In another example, LN3 can be a backup virtual network for LN2, and used only in some situations, such as for handling overflow from LN2.

Referring back to FIG. 5A, the user can specify preferred routes through the virtual network and/or characteristics or costs associated with the virtual components, such as monetary costs, packet loss rates, reliability rate, and/or other metrics. These characteristics can be assigned to the virtual components, such as the virtual computing nodes, node links, logical routers/switches, or the like. The Route Manager 510 can then determine routing tables 512 and/or forwarding tables 514 for the virtual network.

FIG. 5B illustrates an example of a substrate route that can correspond to the virtual route in FIG. 5A. In the figure, there are three data centers 520, 522, 524 corresponding to the logical networks 502, 504, 506 of FIG. 5A. In data center 1 (DC1), a computing node 526 is connected to a network translation device A (NTD A) 528 and a network translation device B (NTD B) 530. The network translation devices are connected to external networks C 532 and D 534, respectively.

The network translation devices can serve as a gateway or entry/exit point into the virtual network. In some embodiments, the network translation devices can translate between a first addressing protocol and a second addressing protocol. For example, if the virtual network is using IPv6 and the external networks are using IPv4, the network translation devices can translate from one addressing protocol to the other for traffic in either direction. In one embodiment, users connect from their private networks to the data centers via a VPN or other connection to a network translation device, which translates and/or filters the traffic between networks.

Referring back to FIG. 5B, network C 532 connects data center 2 522 to NTD A 528. Network D 534 connects data center 3 524 to NTD B 530. The Route Manager module 510 is in communication with data center 1 520, data center 2 522, and data center 3 524, particularly with the Communication Manager for the computing node 526.

From information associated with the virtual network, the Route Manager 510 can determine that the user wants to route traffic from LN1 to LN2. The Route Manager can then “favor” substrate routes associated with the LN1 to LN2 virtual path. For example, the Route Manager can specify a low routing cost (e.g. cost 1) for communications, such as data packets, travelling on Network C relative to Network D (e.g. cost 10) such that during route determination, routes through Network C are favored. In one embodiment, the Route Manager can apply a coefficient to stored substrate costs in order to favor one route over another. In another example, explicit routing paths can be set up corresponding to the virtual route. The Route Manager can identify routes in its routing table and communicate those routes with one or more Communication Managers.

Referring back to FIG. 5B, when the computing node 526 receives or generates a packet destined for LN2 or a network reachable from LN2, the computing node can be configured by the Route Manager to send packets through NTD A 528 as it lies on the route including network C 532.

By propagating virtual network configuration data to the substrate, and using that configuration data in substrate route calculation, a mechanism is provided for a virtual network user to affect substrate routing. In some embodiments, the virtual configuration data can be used in determining association of the virtual components with the substrate components. For example, components of the same virtual network can be associated with the same substrate computing node or on computing nodes connected to the same switch in order to minimize or otherwise improve substrate network traffic. Configuration data can also be provided the other way and, in some embodiments, the user and/or virtual network can be provided with additional substrate information, such as characteristics of the underlying associated substrate components (e.g. performance, costs) in order to make more informed routing decisions.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example substrate network wherein a network translation device determines routes into or out of a virtual network. In FIG. 6, a communication, such as a data packet, leaves computing node A, which is associated with a virtual network, through NTD B 604. The network translation device can include a Route Determination module 605 for determining the packet route. NTD B is connected to network C 606 and network D 608.

In FIG. 6, the Route Manager 610 receives a network configuration or determines that route A-B-C is preferred or has a cheaper cost. The Route Manager can store the route in a routing table 612. The Route Manager can then send forwarding entries to the NTD B 604 that configure it to send traffic through network C 606. NTD B can contain multiple forwarding entries for multiple virtual networks, such that data for one virtual network can be sent through network C, while another virtual network sends data through network D. In some cases, network packets with the same source and/or destination are sent by different networks based on the associated virtual network.

In some embodiments, the substrate component may not have a Communication Manager or a Route Determination module and other ways of coordinating routing can be used. For example, a substrate component, such as an ordinary router or a network translation device, can be set up multiply on separate paths. Using blacklists, network traffic for a particular virtual network can be allowed on one path but blocked on others. The Route Manager can send a control signal or message updating the blacklists to manage the data flow.

In other embodiments, substrate components can implement IP aliasing, where, for example, “fast” path packets use one set of IP addresses, while “slow” path packets use another set of IP addresses. When the substrate component receives the packet, it can determine which path to use based on the IP address. The Route Manager can send a control signal or message to assign IP addresses to the components based on the type of traffic handled.

Other ways of differentiating how packets are handled by substrate components include: tagging of packets, such as by Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS); MAC stacking where a packet could have multiple MAC addresses, the first MAC address for a substrate component, such as a switch, and a second MAC address for a next component either on the “fast” or the “slow” path; and using Network Address Translation (NAT) devices on both ends of a network in order to redirect traffic into the network, such as by spoofing or altering an destination address for an incoming packing and/or altering an the source address of an outgoing packet. In some embodiments, the Route Manager generates control signals or messages for coordinating traffic on the substrate network for the various techniques described above.

Virtual Network Route Selection Process

FIG. 7A illustrates a flow diagram for a process 700 of propagating virtual routes to a substrate network usable in the example networks described above. The virtual routes can be based on network configuration data provided by a virtual network user, such as costs, component characteristics, preferred routes, and/or the like.

At block 705, the Route Manager module receives user configuration and/or network configuration data, such as, for example, policy based routing decisions made by the user. In some embodiments, a user interface is provided, allowing a user to specify configuration data. The Route Manager can receive the configuration data from a data store, for example, if user configuration and/or network configuration data are stored on the data store after being received on the user interface or otherwise generated. In some embodiments, the configuration data can include explicit routing paths through the virtual network. In some embodiments, the configuration data can specify associated costs for traversing components of the virtual network, such as links and/or nodes. These costs can be based on monetary costs, packet loss rates, reliability rate, and/or other metrics. These costs can be provided by the user to configure the virtual network provided by the data center operator. However, costs and other network configuration data can come from the data center operator themselves in addition to or instead of from the user. For example, the data center operator can use the virtual network to provide feedback to the user on routing costs, such as by associating monetary use costs for the substrate computing nodes and/or components. In one example, the data center operator can specify a high cost for a high speed network link or high powered computing node so that the virtual network user can take into account that cost in configuring the virtual network.

At block 710, the Route Manager module determines virtual network routes based on the user configuration and/or network configuration data. In some embodiments, routing protocols or the route determination algorithms of the routing protocols, such as BGP, OSPF, RIP, EIGRP, or the like, can be used to determine virtual routes.

At block 715, the Route Manager determines one or more forwarding entries for substrate network components, such as computing nodes, network translation devices, or the like. As the Route Manager can determine routing paths and propagate routing decisions to the substrate components, the Route Manager can coordinate routing within a data center and/or between multiple data centers.

At block 720, the Route Manager transmits the forwarding entries to the substrate components. At block 725, the substrate component receives the forwarding entries. The substrate network components can store the forwarding entries in FIB tables or similar structures. Generally, a Communication Manager on the substrate component receives and processes the forwarding entry and manages communications of the substrate component.

However, as discussed above, network traffic can also be coordinated for substrate components without a Communication Manager using instead, for example, a NAT device, or the like. In some embodiments, the Route Manager can send blacklist updates, manage tagging of the packets, generate stacked MAC addresses, or the like.

At block 730, the substrate components route packets received or generated according to the stored forwarding entries. Generally, a Communication Manager on the substrate component manages the packet routing and refers to the forwarding entries to make forwarding decisions.

Substrate Network Route Selection Process

FIG. 7B illustrates a flow-diagram for a process 750 for determining substrate routing based on target performance characteristics of the associated virtual network usable in the example networks described above. In some instances, the Route Manager can optionally generate a virtual routing table for the virtual network before determining substrate routing. The virtual routing table can be used to determine virtual routing paths, allowing optimization of network traffic by selective association of the virtual network components with substrate computing nodes, such as by taking into account physical location and virtual network traffic patterns. However, generation of the virtual routing table is not necessary as the substrate routes can be determined independently of the virtual routes, as will be described below. In addition, user configuration and/or network configuration data provided by the user can be used to describe the virtual network, without needing to generate a virtual routing table.

At block 755, the Route Manager receives characteristics of the substrate nodes and/or node links. The Route Manager can receive the characteristics data from a data store. In some embodiments, a user interface is provided, allowing a user to specify characteristics data. The characteristics can describe such things as monetary costs, network bandwidth, network security, network latency, network reliability, and/or the like. These characteristics can be used in a cost function for determining substrate routing paths. This information can be kept by the Route Manager or data source accessible by the Route Manager.

At block 760, the Route Manager receives a target network performance for the virtual network. The target performance can be based on a purchased service level by the user, user history, security data, or the like. For example, a service level purchased by a user can have minimum bandwidth, latency, or quality of service requirements. In another example, a user can be a new customer with an unknown payment history such that the user is provisioned on a “slow” virtual network in order to minimize incurred expenses in case the user fails to pay. In another example, a user identified as carrying dangerous or prohibited traffic, such as viruses, spam, or the like, can be quarantined to particular substrate components. During quarantine, the virtual network components can be assigned to specialized substrate components with more robust security features. For example, the substrate components can have additional monitoring functionally, such as a deep-packet scanning ability, or have limited connectivity from the rest of the substrate network.

At block 765, the Route Manager determines substrate network routes based on the target network performance and/or characteristics of the substrate nodes and/or links. In one embodiment, the Route Manager can use the characteristic data in a cost function for determining routes. Which characteristic to use or what level of service to provide can be determined by the performance criteria or target performance. For example, for a “fast” route, the Route Manager can use bandwidth and/or latency data for the substrate network to generate routes that minimize latency, maximize available bandwidth, and/or otherwise improve network performance.

The Route Manager can re-determine routes as needed based on changes in the network, the configuration data, and/or the performance level. For example, if a user has purchased N gigabits of “fast” routing but has reached the limit, the Route Manager can generate new routes and shift the user to “slow” routing.

At block 770, the Route Manager transmits forwarding entries for one or more routes to one or more nodes and/or network translation devices. In some embodiments, the Route Manager determines forwarding entries for the substrate components and sends those forwarding entries to the substrate components on the path. In some embodiments, the Route Manager can send blacklist updates, manage tagging of data packets, and/or generate stacked MAC addresses.

At block 775, the Route Manager can optionally update the virtual routing table based on substrate network routes. By changing the virtual network routing table based on the substrate routes, the virtual network can stay logically consistent with the behavior of the substrate network. Thus, users won't necessarily be confused by discrepancies in the virtual routing.

Virtual Machine Instance Monitoring and Migration

With reference now to FIGS. 8-11, various embodiments for the monitoring and management of virtual machine instances will be described. With reference to FIGS. 8 and 9, a simplified block diagram of the substrate network 100 of FIG. 1 will be described for purposes of illustrating the interaction between various components of the substrate network. However, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that illustrative interaction and communications may include, or otherwise involve, additional components not illustrated in the illustrative drawing figures.

With reference to FIG. 8, the substrate network 100 includes a number of physical computing systems 105 that host one or more virtual machine instances 107. As will be explained in greater detail, the number of virtual machine instances hosted on each physical computing system 105 can vary according to the computing device resources associated with each individual physical computing system 105 and in accordance with the management policies of the substrate network 100. The substrate network 100 also includes a virtual machine manager component, such as ONM system manager 110, for managing the allocation of virtual machine instances 107 on the various physical computing systems 105. Although the virtual machine manager component is illustrated with regard to functionality implemented by a component of the substrate network 100, in an alternative embodiment, the virtual machine manager component [0085] may be implemented as a standalone component of the substrate network, integrated into a single physical computing system 105 or distributed as functionality implemented among multiple physical computing devices 105.

In communication with the ONM system manager 110 via the communication network 120 is a client computing device interface 802 for obtaining requests from various client computing systems 145 via the external communication network 135. The client computing device interface 802 can obtain various requests, such as requests for monitoring sets of virtual machine instances 107, requests for information associated with the monitoring of identified sets of virtual machine instances as well as other requests. Illustratively, the client computing device interface 802 can facilitate interaction with client computing systems 145 via established Application Protocol Interfaces (“APIs”) provide by the substrate network 100.

Also in communication with the ONM system manager 110 is one or more storage nodes 804 for archiving or storing information associated with the execution of virtual machine instances 107. The storage nodes 804 can correspond to various storage media including physical storage media associated specifically with the substrate network 100. Additionally, or alternatively, the storage nodes 804 can correspond to various network based storage networks accessible to the substrate network 110 via communication network 120.

With reference now to FIG. 9, in one embodiment, the substrate network 100, such as the simplified substrate network illustrated in FIG. 8, includes three physical computing systems 105A, 105B, 105C. Each physical computing system 105A-105C hosts a number of virtual machine instances 107. Specifically, for purposes of illustration, at some point in time, physical computing system 105A hosts virtual machine instances 107A-107F. At the same point in time, physical computing system 105B hosts virtual machine instances 107G-107J. Likewise, physical computing system 105 c hosts virtual machine instances 107K-107N.

In accordance with aspects of the present disclosure, the virtual machine instances 107A-107N can be associated into various sets of virtual machine instances. For example, the sets of virtual machine instances can be associated by affiliation to specific users or user accounts, affiliation to organizations (e.g., a corporate network), specific software applications executed by the virtual machine instances, specific operating systems executed by the virtual machine instances, as well as any number of additional organizational criteria. As will be explained in greater detail below, a virtual machine manager, such as the ONM system manager 110 can manage which virtual machine instances are hosted on physical computing devices 105 in response to a determination of an event, including the migration of virtual machine instances and the processing for instantiation of new virtual machine instances. Additionally, the ONM system manager 110 can implement various processing and data collection techniques in response to the determination of an event.

With reference now to FIGS. 10A and 10B, an illustrative embodiment for managing virtual machine instances will be described. Referring first to FIG. 10A, the ONM system manager 110 begins by monitoring the performance or execution of virtual machine instances 107 on the physical computing systems 105A-105C. In one embodiment, the ONM system manager 110 can monitor execution of the virtual machine instances for various activities that are considered bad behavior, malicious programming or otherwise against the policies of the substrate network. Illustratively, the determination of such detected activity can be dynamic in nature based on various criteria maintained by the ONM system manager 110. In another embodiment, the ONM system manager 110 can monitor the execution of the virtual machine instances for activities that may not be necessarily considered “bad,” but nevertheless may rise to a detected event. In such an embodiment, the ONM system manager 110 may monitor the execution of the virtual machine instances to determine whether utilization of shared computing device resources exceed determined thresholds, such as processing or memory resources. The thresholds may be set by the substrate network 100 based on service level agreements or other policies. Additionally, the detected activity can require manual verification or manual initiation from an administrator associated with the substrate network 100 or an administrator associated the set of virtual machine instances at issue.

For purposes of illustration, at some point, the ONM system manager 110 determines an event has occurred that requires the isolation of an identified set of virtual machine instances 107. The isolation of the virtual machine instances can include one of the migration of any virtual machine instances associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances to one or more physical computing devices 105 and the migration of any virtual machine instances not associated with the identified set of virtual machines instances from targeted physical computing systems. The isolation of the virtual machine instances can also include the management of new requests for instantiation of virtual machine instances such that the ONM system manager 110 prevents the instantiation of virtual machine instances not associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances on any targeted physical computing systems 105 or limits the instantiation of virtual machine instances associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances to the targeted physical computing systems. Based on the commands provided by the ONM system manager 110, each physical computing system 105 manages specific virtual machine instances 107 hosted on the respective physical computing system.

With reference now to FIG. 10B, for purposes of illustration, assume that virtual machine instances 107A, 107B, 107C and 107F are associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances. Accordingly, in one embodiment, physical computing system 105A becomes a targeted physical computing system for isolating the set of virtual machine instances. Accordingly, virtual machine instances 107D and 107E, formerly hosted on physical computing system 105A have been migrated to physical computing system 105B. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the ONM system manager 110 may migrate virtual machine instances 107 to different physical computing devices 105 in a variety of manners. In one example, the ONM system manager 110 can utilize a live migration technique in which all aspects of a virtual machine instance, or virtual machine instances, are transferred between host physical devices without having to terminate the target virtual machine instances. In another example, the ONM system manager 110 can terminate the targeted instance on the first host physical computing device and re-instantiate the virtual machine instance on the target host physical computing device, generally referred to as a termination and re-instantiate migration technique. The ONM system manager 110 may cause the migration to occur immediately based on a direct command or can implement the migration over time based on various criteria including service level agreements, risk levels, and the like. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate, however, the virtual machine instances, such as virtual machine instances 107D or 107E, do not need to be migrated in order to isolate the execution of virtual machine instances 107A, 107B, 107C and 107F.

In another embodiment, in addition to the isolation of sets of virtual machine instances, the ONM system manager 110 can also initiate additional actions responsive to the determination of an event. The additional techniques responsive to the determination of an event may be transparent or known to the isolated set of virtual machine instances (or an administrator). Alternatively, one or more additional techniques may be implemented in a manner that would not be readily apparent to the isolated set of virtual machine instances or an administrator thereof.

In one embodiment, the ONM system manager 110 can prevent any virtual machine instance associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances from accessing other virtual machine instances or a communication network (e.g., a quarantine). In another embodiment, the ONM system manager 110 can limit the amount of access to communication networks by filtering data packets or diverting data packets transmitted from any virtual machine instance associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances. For example, the ONM system manager 110 filter or divert data packets associated or matching specific network addresses (destination or origin), payload types, keywords or search criteria, and the like.

In a further embodiment, the ONM system manager 110 can initiate a testing procedure on one or more virtual machine instances from the identified set of virtual machine instances to try to determine causes for the detected event. In another embodiment, the ONM system manager 110 can initiate an inspection/study of data associated with the execution of the one or more virtual machine instances from the identified set of virtual machine instances, such as a packet level inspection. Additionally, in still a further embodiment, the ONM system manager 110 can archive data or other information associated with the execution of one or more virtual machine instances associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances identified set of virtual machine instances. The data or other information can include copies of any data packets transmitted by the virtual machine instances, configuration or computing system parameters for the virtual machine instances, external information (e.g., timestamps), and the like. The information can be archived at a storage node 808 and be associated with various security protocols and encryption methodologies. Additionally, the ONM system manager 110 can implement data preservation techniques that allow the ONM system manager 110 to retain copies of all information associated with the isolated virtual machine instances. For example, the ONM system manager 110 may retain archival copies of data that has been designated to be deleted by the isolated set of virtual machine instances.

With reference now to FIGS. 11A and 11B, another illustrative embodiment for managing virtual machine instances will be described. Referring first to FIG. 11A, in addition to the monitoring of the performance or execution of virtual machine instances 107 on the physical computing systems 105A-105C as described in FIG. 10A, the ONM system manager 110 can also obtain a request to monitor one or more virtual machine instances. In one embodiment, the request can be transmitted by user associated with a set of virtual machine instances. In another embodiment, the request can be transmitted by various third parties, including system administrators, law enforcement agencies, and the like. Illustratively, the request can identify one or more of the virtual machine instances. Additionally, the ONM system manager 110 can identify additional virtual machine instances or verify the inclusion of virtual machine instances in an identified set of virtual machine instances.

For purposes of illustration, at some point, the ONM system manager 110 determines that an identified set of virtual machine instances 107 requires isolation based on the received request. As previously described, the isolation of the virtual machine instances can include one of the migration of any virtual machine instances associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances to one or more physical computing devices 105 and the migration of any virtual machine instances not associated with the identified set of virtual machines instances from targeted physical computing systems. The isolation of the virtual machine instances can also include the management of new requests for instantiation of virtual machine instances such that the ONM system manager 110 prevents the instantiation of virtual machine instances not associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances on any targeted physical computing systems 105 or limits the instantiation of virtual machine instances associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances to the targeted physical computing systems. Based on the commands provided by the ONM system manager 110, each physical computing system 105 manages specific virtual machine instances 107 hosted on the respective physical computing system.

With reference now to FIG. 11B, for purposes of illustration, assume that the same virtual machine instances 107A, 107B, 107C and 107F are associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances. Accordingly, in one embodiment, physical computing system 105A becomes a targeted physical computing system for isolating the set of virtual machine instances. However, in this example, virtual machine instances 107D and 107E, have not been migrated from physical computing system 105A.

In another embodiment, in addition to the isolation of sets of virtual machine instances, the ONM system manager 110 can also initiate additional actions responsive to the determination of an event. In one example, the ONM system manager 110 can prevent any virtual machine instance associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances from accessing other virtual machine instances or a communication network (e.g., a quarantine). In another example, the ONM system manager 110 can initiate a testing procedure on one or more virtual machine instances from the identified set of virtual machine instances to try to determine causes for the detected event. In a further example, the ONM system manager 110 can initiate an inspection/study of data associated with the execution of the one or more virtual machine instances from the identified set of virtual machine instances, such as a packet level inspection. Additionally, the ONM system manager 110 can archive data or other information associated with the execution of one or more virtual machine instances associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances identified set of virtual machine instances. The data or other information can include copies of any data packets transmitted by the virtual machine instances, configuration or computing system parameters for the virtual machine instances, external information (e.g., timestamps), and the like. The information can be archived at a storage node 808 and be associated with various security protocols and encryption methodologies. Based on the processing of the request, the ONM system manager 110 can return a confirmation, such as via a reporting API.

With reference now to FIG. 12, a flow diagram illustrative of a virtual machine process management routine 1200 executed by a virtual machine manager, such as ONM system manager 110, will be described. Illustratively, routine 1200 can be implemented upon determination of an event that may require the isolation of a set of virtual machine instances (FIGS. 10A and 10B) or upon receipt of a request (FIGS. 11A and 11B). At block 1202, the ONM system manager 110 identifies a set of virtual machine instances to be isolated and monitored. As previously described, the sets of virtual machine instances can be associated by affiliation to specific users or user accounts, affiliation to organizations (e.g., a corporate network), specific software applications executed by the virtual machine instances, specific operating systems executed by the virtual machine instances, as well as any number of additional organizational criteria. Additionally, in one embodiment, each virtual machine instance may be associated into more than one identified set of virtual machine instances. In an alternative embodiment, each virtual machine instance may only be associated with a single set of virtual machine instances. Still further, the set of virtual machine instances can also be identified based on information provided in embodiments in which routine 1200 is initiated based on receipt of a request.

At block 1204, the ONM system manager 110 limits access to the physical computing systems 105 hosting any virtual machine instances associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances. In one aspect, the ONM system manager 110 can prevent the instantiation of any additional virtual machine instance that would not be associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances. In another aspect, the ONM system manager 110 can limit the instantiation of any additional virtual machine instance that would be associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances to one of the physical computing systems 105 currently hosting other virtual machine instances associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances.

At decision block 1206, a test is conducted to determine whether the ONM system manager 110 will migrate any virtual machine instances. In one aspect, the ONM system manager 110 can migrate existing virtual machine instance that would not be associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances from a targeted physical computing system to another physical computing system. In another aspect, the ONM system manager 110 can migrate any virtual machine instance that would be associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances to one of the physical computing systems 105 currently hosting other virtual machine instances associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances or targeted to host the identified set of virtual machine instances. Illustratively, the ONM system manager 110 can utilize various criteria in identifying which physical computing devices 107 will host the set of isolated virtual machines 107. For example, the ONM system manager 110 can consider a customer history in a determination of how many physical computing devices the substrate network 100 will allow to host the isolated virtual machines instances. In another example, the ONM system manager 110 can consider a current load on a target physical computing devices and a number of virtual machine instances already being hosted by target physical computing devices. Still further, the ONM system manager 110 can consider the number of virtual machine instances in the isolated set to determine the minimum number or maximum number of physical computing devices that host isolated virtual machine instances. If the ONM system manager 110 determines to migrate any existing virtual machine instance, at block 1208, the ONM system manager 110 causes the migration of the identified virtual machine instances.

Once the virtual machine instances have been migrated or if no migration will occur, at block 1210, the ONM system manager 110 applies any additional routines to the identified set of virtual machine instances. As previously described, in one example, the ONM system manager 110 can prevent any virtual machine instance associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances from accessing other virtual machine instances or a communication network (e.g., a quarantine). In another example, the ONM system manager 110 can initiate a testing procedure on one or more virtual machine instances from the identified set of virtual machine instances to try to determine causes for the detected event. In a further example, the ONM system manager 110 can initiate an inspection/study of data associated with the execution of the one or more virtual machine instances from the identified set of virtual machine instances, such as a packet level inspection. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the ONM system manager 110 may initiate additional or alternative actions.

At block 1212, the ONM system manager 110 can archive data or other information associated with the execution of one or more virtual machine instances associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances identified set of virtual machine instances. The data or other information can include copies of any data packets transmitted by the virtual machine instances, configuration or computing system parameters for the virtual machine instances, external information (e.g., timestamps), and the like. The information can be archived at a storage node 808 and be associated with various security protocols and encryption methodologies.

In accordance with an illustrative embodiment, the ONM system manager 110 can receive various requests for the archived information, such as from users associated with the identified set of virtual machine instances or from third party. In such embodiment, the ONM system manager 110 can apply various security protocols to ensure that the requesting entity has the appropriate authority to receive the data and to ensure that the integrity of the archived data is maintained. At block 1214, the routine 1200 terminates.

It will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that there are a number of ways to modify the routing information associated with requests from a class of client computing devices. It will further be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that the timing at which performance is monitored and updates to routing information are made can vary.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that all of the functions described in this disclosure may be embodied in software executed by one or more processors of the disclosed components and mobile communication devices. The software may be persistently stored in any type of non-volatile storage.

Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements, and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.

Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. It will further be appreciated that the data and/or components described above may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into memory of the computing device using a drive mechanism associated with a computer readable storing the computer executable components such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or network interface further, the component and/or data can be included in a single device or distributed in any manner. Accordingly, general purpose computing devices may be configured to implement the processes, algorithms, and methodology of the present disclosure with the processing and/or execution of the various data and/or components described above.

It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for managing virtual machine instances comprising: a data store; a plurality of physical computing devices; and a processor configured to execute processor-executable instructions to perform operations comprising: determining that an event associated with a customer of a service provider has occurred; identifying, in the data store, information indicating: a first subset of physical computing devices associated with the customer, wherein responsive to the event, the first subset of physical computing devices is only authorized to host any additional virtual machine instances that are associated with the customer, wherein each physical computing device of the first subset of physical computing devices of the plurality of physical computing devices is hosting at least one of a set of virtual machine instances associated with the customer, and a second subset of physical computing devices comprising all physical computing devices of the plurality of physical computing devices that are not in the first subset, wherein the second subset of physical computing devices is prevented from hosting any new virtual machine instance associated with the customer; receiving a request to instantiate a new virtual machine instance; determining whether the customer is associated with the new virtual machine instance; selecting, from among the plurality of physical computing devices, a physical computing device to host the new virtual machine instance based at least in part on the information stored in the data store and whether the customer is associated with the new virtual machine instance; and causing instantiation of the new virtual machine instance on the selected physical computing device.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the customer is associated with the new virtual machine instance and wherein the processor is configured to execute processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that selecting the physical computing device to host the new virtual machine instance based at least in part on the information stored in the data store comprises selecting a physical computing device from the first subset of physical computing devices.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the customer is not associated with the new virtual machine instance and wherein the processor is configured to execute processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that selecting a physical computing device to host the new virtual machine instance based at least in part on the information stored in the data store comprises selecting a physical computing device from the second subset of computing devices.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to execute processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that determining that the event associated with the customer has occurred comprises detecting that at least one of the set of virtual machine instances associated with the customer has executed malicious programming.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to execute processor-executable instructions to perform operations further comprising causing, based at least in part on the information stored in the data store, migration of one or more virtual machine instances associated with another customer away from the one or more of the first subset of physical computing devices.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to execute processor-executable instructions to perform operations further comprising causing, based at least in part on the information stored in the data store, migration of one or more virtual machine instances associated with the customer to one or more of the first subset of physical computing devices.
 7. The system of claim 6, wherein: the information stored in the data store further comprises information regarding at least one of a customer history of the customer, a current load of each of the plurality of physical computing devices, or a number of instances hosted on each of the plurality of physical computing devices; and the processor is configured to execute processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that causing, based at least in part on the information stored in the data store, migration of the one or more virtual machine instances associated with the customer to one or more of the first subset of physical computing devices comprises: selecting, from the one or more of the first subset of physical computing devices, one or more physical computing devices based on at least one of the customer history of the customer, a current load of the one or more selected physical computing devices, or a number of instances hosted on the one or more selected physical computing devices; and causing migration of the one or more virtual machine instances associated with the customer to the one or more selected physical computing devices.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the second subset comprises at least a first subgroup of physical computing devices and a second subgroup of physical computing devices, wherein the physical computing devices in the first subgroup are only authorized to host virtual machine instances associated with a second customer, and wherein the physical computing devices in the second subgroup is prevented from hosting any new virtual machine instance associated with the second customer.
 9. A computer-implemented method comprising: determining that an event associated with a customer of a service provider has occurred; identifying, in a data store, information indicating: one or more first computing devices of a plurality of computing devices associated with the customer, wherein responsive to the event, the one or more first computing devices are only authorized to host any additional virtual machine instances associated with the customer, wherein each of the first computing devices is hosting at least one of a set of virtual machine instances associated with the customer, and one or more second computing devices comprising all computing devices of the plurality of computing devices that are not the first computing devices, wherein the one or more second computing devices are prevented from hosting any new virtual machine instance associated with the customer; receiving a request to instantiate a new virtual machine instance; determining whether the customer is associated with the new virtual machine instance; and selecting, from the plurality of computing devices, a computing device to host the new virtual machine instance based at least in part on the information stored in the data store and whether the customer is associated with the new virtual machine instance.
 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 further comprising: obtaining information regarding execution, at a time the event occurred, of the one or more first computing devices; and archiving the information regarding the execution of the one or more first computing devices.
 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein at least one computing device of the one or more first computing devices is hosting a virtual machine instance associated with the customer.
 12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 further comprising storing, in the data store, additional information related to execution of the virtual machine instance associated with the customer on the at least one computing device.
 13. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the additional information related to execution of the virtual machine instance associated with the customer on the at least one computing device comprises information related to at least one of data packets transmitted by the virtual machine instance associated with the customer, a configuration of the virtual machine instance associated with the customer, security protocols of the virtual machine instance associated with the customer, or an encryption methodology of the virtual machine instance associated with the customer.
 14. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 further comprising storing, in the data store, additional information indicating a communication limitation associated with the virtual machine instance associated with the customer.
 15. The computer-implemented method of claim 14 further comprising preventing the virtual machine instance associated with the customer from accessing another virtual machine instance not associated with the customer based at least in part on the communication limitation indicated in the additional information stored in the data store.
 16. The computer-implemented method of claim 14 further comprising preventing the virtual machine instance associated with the customer from accessing a communication network based at least in part on the communication limitation indicated in the additional information stored in the data store.
 17. The computer-implemented method of claim 14 further comprising limiting communications from the virtual machine instance associated with the customer based at least in part on the communication limitation indicated in the additional information stored in the data store.
 18. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein limiting communications from the virtual machine instance associated with the customer based at least in part on the communication limitation indicated in the additional information stored in the data store comprises at least one of filtering data packets or diverting data packets transmitted from the virtual machine instance associated with the customer.
 19. The system of claim 9, wherein the one or more second computing devices comprise at least a first subgroup of computing devices and a second subgroup of computing devices, wherein the computing devices in the first subgroup are only authorized to host virtual machine instances associated with a second customer, and wherein the second subgroup is prevented from hosting any virtual machine instance associated with the second customer.
 20. A system for managing virtual machine instances comprising: a data store; a plurality of physical computing devices; and a processor configured to execute processor-executable instructions to perform operations comprising: determining that an event associated with a customer of a service provider has occurred; identifying, in the data store, information indicating: responsive to the event, a first set of physical computing devices of the plurality of physical computing devices associated with the customer are only authorized to host any additional virtual machine instances associated with the customer, wherein each of the first set of physical computing devices is hosting at least one of a set of virtual machine instances associated with the customer, and a second set of physical computing devices of the plurality of physical computing devices are prevented from hosting any new virtual machine instances associated with the customer, wherein the physical computing devices in the second set comprise all physical computing devices of the plurality of physical computing devices that are not in the first set, and receiving a request to instantiate a new virtual machine instance; determining whether the customer is associated with the new virtual machine instance; and selecting, from the plurality of physical computing devices, a physical computing device to host the new virtual machine instance based at least in part on the information stored in the data store and whether the customer is associated with the new virtual machine instance.
 21. The system of claim 20, wherein the processor is configured to execute processor-executable instructions to perform operations further comprising determining a cause of the event.
 22. The system of claim 21, wherein the processor is configured to execute processor-executable instructions to perform operations further comprising storing an association between the cause of the event and one or more first set of physical computing devices.
 23. The system of claim 21, wherein the processor is configured to execute processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that determining a cause of the event comprises inspecting packet data associated with execution, at a time the event occurred, of one or more virtual machine instances associated with the customer on the first set of physical computing devices.
 24. The system of claim 20, wherein the second subset of physical computing devices comprises at least a first subgroup of physical computing devices and a second subgroup of physical computing devices, wherein the physical computing devices in the first subgroup are only authorized to host virtual machine instances associated with a second customer, and wherein the second subgroup is prevented from hosting any virtual machine instance associated with the second customer. 